Publications

Publications (from 2016 to date)

Legal psychology
Criminal justice system
Validity of statements
Witness and suspect interviewing
Eyewitness collaboration
Evidence
Police investigation
Geographical profiling
Female offenders

 

Legal psychology

Horselenberg, R., Keijser, J.W. de, Jelicic, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Over de rechtspsychologie [On legal psychology]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 25-33). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Keijser, J.W. de, Koppen, P.J. van, Horselenberg, R. & Jelicic, M. (2017). Klassieke experimenten in de rechtspsychologie [Classical experiments in legal psychology]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 35-48). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Koppen, P.J. van (2018). De vreemde ontvoering van Roel van Duijn [The weird kidnapping of Roel van Duijn]. Argus, 1(23), 6-8.

Koppen, P.J. van, Keijser, J.W. de, Horselenberg, R. & Jelicic, M. (Eds.). (2017). Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie [Venues of the law: On legal psychology]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

 

Criminal justice system

Beermann, M., Fransen, J., Korte, S. de, Luisa, Z., Nieuwendijk, S. van den, Ruiter, E., Veenstra, L., Winniczuk, M., Beijers, G., Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). De PlayStation-moorden: Over bewijs van medeplegen [The PlayStation murders: About evidence of complicity]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Boer, M.M. de, Wiznitzer, S.N.P., Evertzen, M.J.C., Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). De gescheurde nagel: Een alternatieve verklaring voor DNA-bewijs [The torn fingernail: An alternative explanation for DNA evidence]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Bruïne, G. de, Boer, A. de, Dehaene, T., Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Een Rwandees kaartenhuis: Een wirwar van wankelende verklaringen [A Rwandan house of cards: A labyrinth of wavering statements]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Crolla, F., Sijsling, H., Ykema, L., Grimberg, M., Ranzijn, N., Zutter, A. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). The creative carpenter: Biased presentation of evidence in a jury trial. Den Haag: Eleven.

Crombag, H.F.M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Rechtvaardigheid [Justice]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 809-820). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Dobben, M.L. van, Verkuijlen, F., Jovanović, L., Stokhof, M.R., Borst, L.L.M., Schaik, Y. van, Thiel, M.A.H. van, Willemsen, M., Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). De dansende dader: Veelzeggende experimenten [The dancing offender: Telling experiments]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Doorn, J. van, Kunst, M.J.J., Brands, J. & Keijser, J.W. de (2020). De rol van slachtoffercompensatie in de publieke waardering van strafoplegging [The role of victim compensation on the public opinion of sentencing]. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 62(1), 34-47.

Ernst, A., Besselink, L., Hagen, C. van, Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De actievoerder achterna: Over een snelle bekentenis en een late ontkenning [Chasing the activist: On a quick confession and a late denial]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Es, R.M.S. van, Kunst, M.J.J. & Keijser, J.W. de (2020). Forensic mental health expert testimony and judicial decision-making: A systematic literature review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 51, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101387

Keijser, J.W. de, Roberts, J.V. & Ryberg, J. (Eds.) (2019). Predictive sentencing: Normative and empirical perspectives. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Koppen, P.J. van (2017). De tengelhamer en het schedeldak: Over rapportages door het Nederlands Forensisch Instituut [The slater hammer and the cranium: On reports by the Dutch Forensic Institute]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 92, 1444-1452.

Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Hoe onlogisch werken toch logisch kan worden gevonden [How illogical reporting can be called logical]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 92, 2952-2953.

Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Het deskundigenbewijs van de rechtspsycholoog [Expert evidence by the legal psychologist]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 439-459). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Rechterlijke dwalingen [Miscarriages of justice]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 883-916). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Koppen, P.J. van (2017e). Schuld toedelen en boete doen [Distributing guilt and serve penance]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 821-836). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2018). Waarom er in België en Nederland geen rechterlijke dwalingen zijn [Why there are no miscarriages of justice in Belgium and the Netherlands]. Expertise en Recht, 2018, 276-281.

Koppen, P.J. van & Keijser, J.W. de (2017). Invloeden op de rechterlijke beslissing [Influences on legal decisions]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 853-866). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Koppen. P.J. van & Mackor, A.R. (2020). A scenario-approach to the Simonshaven case. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1132-1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12429 

Mackor, A.R., Jellema, H. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Explanation-based approaches to reasoning about evidence and proof in criminal trials. In: B. Brożek, J. Hage & N.A. Vincent (red.), Law and mind: A survey of law and the cognitive sciences (pp. 431-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mackor, A.R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law. In: C. Dahlman, A. Stein & G. Tuzet (red.), Philosophical foundations of evidence law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Maegherman, E., Ask, K., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Test of the analysis of competing hypotheses in legal decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3738

Maegherman, E., Ask, K., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Accountability in legal decision-making. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Advanced online publication, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904452

Maegherman, E.F.L., Boer, M.M. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De onzichtbare steekpartij: Over strategische selectie van getuigenbewijs [The invisible stabbing: On strategic selection of witness evidence]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Malefason, F. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). Vechtpartij na hockeygala: Wirwar van conflicterende getuigenverklaringen over een gebroken kaak [A fight after a hockey gala: A hotchpotch of conflicting witness statements on a broken jaw]. Koud Bloed, 31, 81-93.

Merckelbach, H. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). Ethische babbels over de zaak De Ruiter [Ethic prattles on the De Ruiter Case]. De Psycholoog, 51, 23-25.

Nieuwkamp, R., & Robert, L. (2019). Rechterlijke dwalingen, geen onschuldige materie [Miscarriages of justice, no innocent matters]. FATIK, 3, 23-28.

Rijnders, J., Dirksen, L., Splinters, R., Scheepers, J., Beijers, G., Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De Mokumse mokermoord: Bewijsproblemen met camera-opnames [The Amsterdam Sledge Murder: Evidence problems of CCTV recordings]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Stad, D. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). Het likkende hondje: Het onderscheid tussen moord en zelfmoord [The licking dog: The difference between murder and suicide]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Teunissen, J., Nietzman, L., Kramer, J.-A., Verstrepen, P., Zwanenburg, M., Nieuwkamp, R., Zutter, A.W.E.A. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Het dodelijke dienstwapen: Over bewijs van afvuren [A deadly service gun: On evidence of firing]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Maegherman, E., & Horselenberg, R. (2019). Het verhaal gewogen: Kennis van strafrechters over het geheugen en het politieverhoor [Weighed the story: Knowledge of criminal judges on memory and the police interview]. Strafblad, 17(4), 58-63.

Vis, J., Akker, K. van den, Hoes, L., Simons, E., Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De dood van een politie-aspirant: Over interpretatie van sporen [The death of a police cadet: On interpretation of forensic traces]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Vredeveldt, A., Hildebrandt. A., Kemp. J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). De thuishulp in het Laakkwartier: Sporen van moord, diefstal of schoonmaak [The housekeeper in Laakkwartier: Traces of murder, theft or cleaning]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Vredeveldt, A., Otgaar, H.P., Merckelbach, H. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Het rechtspsychologische deskundigenrapport [The legal psychological expert witness report]. Expertise & Recht, 6, 243-247.

Wermink, H.T., Keijser, J.W. de & Schuyt, P.M. (2019). Verdere reflectie op onderzoek naar straftoemeting. Nederlands Juristenblad, 94(10), 675-676.

 

Validity of statements

Anakwah, N., Horselenberg, R., Hope, L., Amankwah-Poku, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). Cross-cultural differences in eyewitness memory reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3637 

Anakwah, N., Horselenberg, R., Hope, L., Amankwah-Poku, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). The acculturation effect and eyewitness memory reports among sub-Saharan African migrants. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12179

Bruïne, G. de, Vredeveldt, A., & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Cross-cultural differences in object recognition: Comparing asylum seekers from sub-Saharan Africa and a matched Western European control group. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 463-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3419

Hamlin, I., Taylor, P.J., Cross, L., MacInnes, K., & Zee, S. van der (2020). A psychometric investigation into the structure of deception strategy use. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09380-4 

Horselenberg, R., Boon, R., Odinot, G. & Vredeveldt, A. (2017). Het interviewen van getuigen [Interviewing witnesses]. Hoofdstuk in P. J. van Koppen, J. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Red.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Otgaar, H., Horselenberg, R., Rassin, E., Wessel, I., Jelicic, M., Vredeveldt, A., & Koppen, P.J. van. (2021). De wetenschap achter verdrongen en valse herinneringen. [The science behind repressed and false memories.] De Psycholoog.

Saraiva, R.B, Boeijen, I. van, Hope, L., Horselenberg, R., Sauerland, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Development and validation of the Eyewitness Metamemory Scale (EMS). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 964-973. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3588

Saraiva, R.B., Boeijen, I. van, Hope, L., Horselenberg, R., Sauerland, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). Eyewitness metamemory predicts identification performance in biased and unbiased lineups. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12166 

Saraiva, R.B., Hope, L., Horselenberg, R., Ost, J., Sauer, J. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020) Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance. Memory, 28, 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835

Shaw, J., & Vredeveldt, A. (2019). The recovered memory debate continues in Europe: Evidence from the UK, the Netherlands, France, and Germany. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 27-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026188036

Vredeveldt, A. & Zee, S. van der (2017). De betekenis van consistentie in verklaringen [The meaning of consistency in statements]. Hoofdstuk in P. J. van Koppen, J. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Red.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). The thin blue line-up: A comparison of eyewitness performance by police and civilians. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5, 252–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.06.013

Vredeveldt, A., Charman, S.D., Blanken, A. den & Hooydonk, M. (2018). Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3414

Vredeveldt, A., Knol, J. W. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Observing offenders: Incident reports by surveillance detectives, uniformed police, and civilians. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22, 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12087

Vredeveldt, A., Koppen, P.J. van & Granhag, P.A. (2014). The inconsistent suspect: A systematic review of consistency in truth tellers and liars. In R. H. Bull (Ed.), Investigative interviewing (pp. 183–207). London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9642-7_10

Zee, S. van der, Poppe, R., Havrileck, A., & Baillon, A. (2021). A personal model of trumpery: Testing linguistic deception detection in a real-world high-stakes setting. Psychological Science, Advance online publication.

Zee, S. van der , Poppe, R.W., Taylor, P.J., & Anderson, R. (2019). To freeze or not to freeze: A culture-sensitive motion-capture approach to detecting deceit. PlosOne, 14(4), e0215000. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215000 

Zee, S. van der, Taylor, P.J., Miles, R., Dixon, J., & Menacere, T. (2021). Copycat and a liar: Nonverbal mimicry increases under the cognitive load of lying. Royal Society Open Science, 8(1), 200839. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200839.  

Zutter, A.W.E.A. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Detecting the true nature of allegations of rape. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 32, 114-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9203-z

Zutter, A.W.E.A. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Filing false vice reports: Distinguishing true from false allegations of rape. European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 9, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpal.2016.02.002

Zutter, A.W.E.A. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Motives for filing a false allegation of rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 457-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0951-3

Zutter, A.W.E.A. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). The prevalence of false allegations of rape in the United States from 2006-2010. Journal of Forensic Psychology, 2, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.4172/2475-319X.1000119

Zutter, A.W.E.A. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). A relationship, a venereal disease and its aftermath. II-RP Journal, 8, 59-98.

 

Witness and suspect interviewing

Adams-Quackenbush, N.M., Horselenberg, R., Hubert, J., Vrij, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Interview expectancies: Awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522

Adams-Quackenbush, N.M.,  Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Where bias begins: A snapshot of police officers’ beliefs about the investigative interview with suspects. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34, 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9301-1.

Adams-Quackenbush, N.M., Horselenberg, R., Tomas, F. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Detecting guilt-presumption in a police-suspect interview: An evaluation of the questions in a murder case. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 10, 37-60.

Adams-Quackenbush, N.M., Horselenberg, R., Vrij, A., Satchell, L.P. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). Articulating guilt? The influence of guilt presumption on interviewer question phrasing and word abstraction. Current Psychology, Advance online publication, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00726-z 

Brimbal, L., Kleinman, S.M., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Meissner, C.A. (2020). Developing rapport and trust in the interrogative context: An empirically-supported and ethical alternative to customary interrogation practices. In book: Interrogation and torture: Research on efficacy and its integration with morality and legality. Oxford University Press

Brimbal, L., Meissner, C.A., Kleinman, S.M., Phillips, E.L., Atkinson, D.J., Dianiska, R.E., Rothweiler, J.N., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Jones, M.S. (2021). Evaluating the benefits of a rapport-based approach to investigative interviews: A training study with law enforcement investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000437

De La Fuente Vilar, A., Horselenberg, R., Strömwall, L.A., Landström, S., Hope, L. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020) Effects of cooperation on information disclosure in mock-witness interviews. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12167

Granhag, P.A., Oleszkiewicz, S., Sakrisvold, M.L., & Kleinman, S.M. (2019). The Scharff technique: Training military intelligence officers to elicit information from small cells of sourcesPsychology, Crime, and Law, 26(5), 438-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1669600

Hope, L., Anakwah, N., Antfolk, J., Brucacher, S.P., Flowe, H., Gabberts, F., Giebels, E., Kanja, W., Korkman, J., Kyo, A., Naka, M., Otgaar, H., Powell, M.B., Selim, H., Skrifvars, J., Kwasi sorkpah, I., Sowatey, E.A., Steele, L.C., Stevens, L., Sumampouw, N.E.J., Taylor, P.J., Trevino-Range;, J., Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Wang, J., Wells, S. (in press). Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology.

Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Kinderen als getuigen [Interviewing children]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 591-615). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Valse bekentenissen [False confessions]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 687-709). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Verhoren op audio en op video [Interrogations on tape]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 635-641). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Horselenberg, R., Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). Nederlandse politieverhoren in de praktijk [Dutch police interviews in practice]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 43, 3185.

Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2017). Identificatie [Identification]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 283-334). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Koppen, P.J. van & Walhout, F. (2017). Getuigen helpen herkennen: Signalementen, compo’s en vermommingen [Helping witnesses: Offender descriptions, composites and disguishes]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 335-352). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Mergaerts, L., Nieuwkamp, R. & Schellingen, R. (2020). Het verhoren van personen: opportuniteiten in coronatijden [Interviewing people: opportunities in times of corona].

Odinot, G., Rosmalen, E.A.J. van, & Vredeveldt, A. (in press). Eyewitness testimony. In J. M. Brown & M. A. H. Horvath (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oleszkiewicz, S., & Granhag, P.A. (2020). Establishing cooperation and eliciting information: Semi-cooperative sources’ affective resistance and cognitive strategies. In book: Handbook of legal and investigative psychology. Routledge

Oleszkiewicz, S., & Watson, S. J. (2021). A meta-analytics review of the timing for disclosing evidence when interviewing suspects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 342-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3767

Rantamäki, S., Antfolk, J., Granhag, P.A., Santtila, P., & Oleszkiewicz, S. (2020). Eliciting Intelligence from sources informed about counter-interrogation strategies: An experimental study on the Scharff TechniqueJournal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1542

Skrifvars, J., Korkman, J., Sui, V., Veldhuizen, T. van, & Antfolk, J. (2020). An analysis of question style and type in official Finnish asylum interview transcripts. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1557

Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Horselenberg, R., Landström, S., Granhag, P.A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Interviewing asylum seekers: A vignette study on the questions asked to assess credibility of claims about origin and persecution. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14, 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1472

Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Horselenberg, R., Stel, M., Landström, S., Granhag, P.A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). The provenance of émigrés: The validity of measuring knowledge of places. Psychology, Crime and Law, 23(6), 553-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1284219

Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Maas, R.P.A.E., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Establishing origin: Analysing questions in asylum interviews. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25, 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1376607

Vredeveldt, A. (2019). Getuigenverhoor bij de rechter-commissaris: De invloed van overleg tussen getuigen [Eyewitness interviews by the investigative judge: The influence of discussion between witnesses]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 2, 119-122.

Vredeveldt, A. & Tredoux, C. G. (2017). The Eye-Closure Interview: The practical utility of instructing eyewitnesses to close their eyes. In P.A. Granhag, R. Bull, A. Shaboltas & E. Dozortseva (Eds.), Psychology and Law in Europe: When West meets East (pp. 231-246). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

 

Eyewitness collaboration

Vredeveldt, A., Deuren, S. van, & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Remembering with a stranger: Comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews. Memory, 27, 1390-1403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1662052

Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Recounting a common experience: On the effectiveness of instructing eyewitness pairs. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284

Vredeveldt, A., Groen, R. N., Ampt, J.E. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). When discussion between eyewitnesses helps memory. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 22, 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12097

Vredeveldt, A., Hildebrandt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). Acknowledge, repeat, rephrase, elaborate: Witnesses can help each other remember more. Memory, 24, 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1042884

Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). Samen of apart: De invloed van overleg tussen agenten tijdens het opstellen van het proces-verbaal [Together or separate: The influence of discussion between police officers while writing incident reports]. Apeldoorn: Programma Politie & Wetenschap.

Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Writing alone or together: Police officers’ collaborative reports of an incident. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(7), 1071–1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818771721

 

Evidence

Boer, M.M. de, Wiznitzer, S.N.P. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Foreign DNA in cosmetic gel nails. Forensic Science International, 319, 110677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110677

Es, R.M.S. van, Doorn, J. van, Keijser, J.W. de & Kunst, M.J.J. (2020). Het effect van een pro Justitia-rapportage op de bewijsbeslissing: Een empirische verkenning [The effect of a forensic mental health report on the decision of proof: A empirical reconnaissance]. Recht der Werkelijkheid, 41(2), 15-36.

Kesteloo, L., & Vredeveldt, A. (2021). Bodycambeelden als controlemiddel in de strafrechtspraktijk [Body-worn camera footage as a monitoring tool in the practice of criminal law]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 13, 966-973.

Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2019). Een kleine Netflix-gids voor de bewijsliefhebber [A concise Netflix guide for the evidence afficionado]. Expertise en Recht, 2019, 79-86.

Koppen, M.V. van, & Nieuwkamp, R. (2017). Alibi’s. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 249-260). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Maegherman, E., Ask, K., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Law and order effects: On cognitive dissonance and belief perseverance. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, Advance online publication, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1855268

Nieuwkamp, R. (2018). Where I was and how I will prove it. On the believability of alibis. Enschede: Gildeprint.

Nieuwkamp, R., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). A lie and a mistress: On increasing the believability of your alibi. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 23, 733-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2016.1142934

Nieuwkamp, R., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). The illusion of the perfect alibi: Establishing the base rate of non-offenders’ alibis. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 14, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1470

Nieuwkamp, R., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). True and false alibis among prisoners and its detection by police officers. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law25, 902-921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1482570

Schimmel, L.M.C. & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Verdachten testen: Testgebruik in de forensische psychologie [Testing suspects: The use of tests by forensic psychologists]. De Psycholoog, 52, 34-42.

Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L. & Hildebrandt, A. (2020). De rol van bodycambeelden in de opsporing en bewijsvoering. Politiewetenschap, 119, 1-85.

Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L., & Hildebrandt, A. (in press). To watch or not to watch: When reviewing body-worn camera footage improves police reports. Law and Human Behavior. http://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000462

 

Police investigation

Eeden, C.A.J. van den, Berkel, J.J. van, Lankhaar, C.C., & Poot, C.J. de (2021). Opsporen, vervolgen en tegenhouden van cybercriminaliteit [Investigating, prosecuting and obstructing cybercrime]. WODC.

Eeden, C.A.J. van den, Ost, J., Poot, C.J. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Solving the puzzle: The effects of contextual information and feedback on the interpretation of a crime scene. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1494

Eeden, C.A.J. van den, Poot, C.J. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2016). Forensic expectation: Investigating a crime scene with prior information. Science and Justice, 56, 475-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.08.003

Eeden, C.A.J. van den, Poot, C.J. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). From emergency call to crime scene: Information transference in the criminal investigation. Forensic Science Policy and Management, 8, 79-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/19409044.2017.1385660

Elffers, H. & Kemp, J.J. van der (2016) Als je nou politiecijfers combineert met slachtofferenquêtes, dan … ben je nog nergens. Wat nu? Cahiers Politiestudies: Meten is Weten, 41(4), 43-55.

Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2017). Kijk met een open blik naar cold cases [Keep an open mind with cold cases]. De Standaard (31 oktober).

Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2018). Van toneelspelende politiemensen en onwetende verdachten die bekennen tegen Mr. Big [Of play-acting police officers and ignorant suspects who confess to Mr. Big]. Strafblad.

Koppen, P.J. van, Kemp, J.J. van der & Wijkman, M.D.S. (2019). Rapporteren over activiteiten op de plaats delict: Over de keuze tussen daders [Reporting on activities at the crime scene: About the choice between offenders]. Expertise en Recht, 2019, 96-104.

Nortje, A., Tredoux, C. G., & Vredeveldt, A.(2020). Eyewitness identification of multiple perpetrators. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 348-381.

Pike, G.E., Brace, N.A., Turner, J., & Vredeveldt, A. (2019). The effect of facial composite construction on eyewitness identification accuracy in an ecologically valid paradigm. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818811376

Pike, G.E., Brace, N.A., Turner, J., Ness, H. & Vredeveldt, A. (2019). Advances in facial composite technology, utilizing holistic construction, do not lead to an increase in eyewitness misidentifications compared to older feature-based systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01962

Sporer, S. L., Tredoux, C. G., Vredeveldt, A., Kempen, K., & Nortje, A. (2020). Does exposure to facial composites damage eyewitness memory? A comprehensive review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1166-1179. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3705

Tredoux, C. G., Sporer, S. L.,Vredeveldt, A., Kempen, K., & Nortje, A. (2020). Does constructing a facial composite affect eyewitness memory? A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, Advance online publicationhttp://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09432-z

 

Geographical profiling

Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2017). Profilering in de opsporing [Profiling in criminal investigations]. In P.J. van Koppen, J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg & M. Jelicic (Eds.), Routes van het recht: Over de rechtspsychologie (pp. 217-247). Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.

Tonkin, M., Pakkanen, T., Sirén, J., Bennell, C., Woodhams, J., Burrell, A., Imre, H., Winter, J.M., Lam, E., Brinke, G. ten, Webb, M., Labuschagne, G.N., Ashmore-Hills, L., Kemp, J.J. van der, Lipponen, S., Rainbow, L., Salfati, C.G. & Santtila, P. (2017). Using offender crime scene behavior to link stranger sexual assaults: A comparison of three statistical approaches. Journal of Criminal Justice, 50, 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.002

 

Female offenders

Vogel, V. de, Wijkman, M. D. S. & de Vries Robbe, M. (2017). Violence risk assessment in women. In J. Ireland & C. Ireland (Eds.), Violent and sexual offenders: Assessment, treatment and management. Cullompton: Willan.

Wijkman, M. D. S. (2016). Vrouwen kunnen ook verkrachters zijn [Women can be rapists, too]. EOS Wetenschap.

Wijkman, M. D. S. (2017). Female incest offenders. In F. Bernat & K. Frailing (Eds.), The encyclopedia of women and crime. New Jersey: Wiley.

Wijkman, M. D. S. & Sandler, J. (2017). Female sexual offenders. In P. Lussier & E. Beauregard (Eds.), Sexual offending: A criminological perspective. New Jersey: Wiley.