Publications (from 2018 to date)
Legal psychology
Criminal justice system
Validity of statements
Witness and suspect interviewing
Eyewitness collaboration
Evidence
Police investigation
Geographical profiling
Legal psychology
2024
Keijser, J.W. de, Horselenberg, R., & Vredeveldt, A. (red.) (2024). Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Keijser, J.W. de, Horselenberg, R., Geven, L., Koppen, P.J. van & Jelicic, M. (2024). Klassieke experimenten in de rechtspsychologie [Classic experiments in legal psychology]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Vredeveldt, A., Horselenberg, R. & Keijser, J.W. de (2024). Over de rechtspsychologie [About legal psychology]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
2023
Landström, S., Granhag, P.A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2023). The future of forensic psychology: Core topics and emerging trends. London: Routledge.
2022
Koppen, P.J. van (2022). De ijzeren regels van goud bewijs: Over rechtspsychologie en een eerlijk strafproces [The iron rules of golden evidence: On legal psychology and a fair trial]. Afscheidsrede Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
2018
Koppen, P.J. van (2018). De vreemde ontvoering van Roel van Duijn [The weird kidnapping of Roel van Duijn]. Argus, 1(23), 6-8.
Criminal justice system
2024
Doorn, J. van & Koppen, P.J. van (2024). Schuld toedelen [Determining guilt]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Drenk, D., Muckermann, V., Schoonmade, L., Holá, B. & Vredeveldt, A. (2024). The influence of culture on witness testimony: An interdisciplinary scoping review. Amsterdam Law Forum, in press.
Koppen, P.J. van (2024). Rechterlijke dwalingen [Miscarriages of justice]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Koppen, P.J. van, Keijser, J.W. de & Vredeveldt, A. (2024). De rechtspsycholoog als deskundige [The legal psychologist as an expert]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
2023
Koppen, P.J. van (2023). De strafjury en haar taak [The jury in criminal trials and its task]. Ars Aequi, 72, 119-127.
Koppen, P.J. van, Kemp, J.J. van der & Beijers, G.W. (2023). De Warnsveldse Pompmoord ofwel de Vier van Warnsveld [The Warnsveld Petrol Murder or the Warnsveld Four] (2e druk). Den Haag: Boom.
Nijsen, E., Bolhuis, M.P., De Zutter, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2023) De Zwolse zwendel: Afpersing, doodslag of ongeluk [The Zwolle Scam: Extortion, manslaughter or accident]. Den Haag: Boom criminologie.
Oosterwechel, F. & Koppen, P.J. van (2023). Mister Big en de verdwijning van Patrick [Mister Big and the disappearance of Patrick]. Den Haag: Boom criminologie.
Zeldenrijk, E., Geelen, L., Baudert, L., De Zutter, A., Beijers, G., Veldhuizen, T.S. van & Koppen, P.J. van (2023) De dode in het dressoir: Afwezig bewijs in de Kasteelmoord [The corpse in the sideboard: On lacking evidence in the Canal Murder]. Den Haag: Boom criminologie.
2022
Maegherman, E., Ask, K., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2022). Accountability in legal decision-making. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 29, 345-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1904452
Koppen, P.J. van (2022). Deskundigen van het openbaar ministerie zijn anders dan deskundigen van de verdediging [Prosecution experts are different from defence experts]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 97, 1386-1391.
Koppen, P.J. van (2022). Rafelranden van de rechtstaat: Over verhoren, herkennen en deskundigen [Frayed edges of the rule of law: On interrogations, identifications and expert witnesses]. De Psycholoog, 57(september), 10-20.
Koppen, P.J. van, Horselenberg, R. & Ebbekink, L.M. (2022). De fietser op de hei: Scenario’s en bewijs in de zaak tegen Jos B. [The cyclist on the moor: Scenarios and evidence in the Jos B. Case]. Den Haag: Boom criminologie.
Vredeveldt, A., Rosmalen, E.A.J. van, Koppen, P.J. van, Dror, I.E. & Otgaar, H. (2022). Legal psychologists as experts: Guidelines for minimizing bias. Psychology, Crime and Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2114476
2021
Mackor, A.R., Jellema, H. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Explanation-based approaches to reasoning about evidence and proof in criminal trials. In: B. Brożek, J. Hage & N.A. Vincent (red.), Law and mind: A survey of law and the cognitive sciences (pp. 431-469). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mackor, A.R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). The scenario theory about evidence in criminal law. In: C. Dahlman, A. Stein & G. Tuzet (red.), Philosophical foundations of evidence law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maegherman, E., Ask, K., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Test of the analysis of competing hypotheses in legal decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35, 62-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3738
Teunissen, J., Nietzman, L., Kramer, J.-A., Verstrepen, P., Zwanenburg, M., Nieuwkamp, R., Zutter, A.W.E.A. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Het dodelijke dienstwapen: Over bewijs van afvuren [A deadly service gun: On evidence of firing]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
2020
Ernst, A., Besselink, L., Hagen, C. van, Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De actievoerder achterna: Over een snelle bekentenis en een late ontkenning [Chasing the activist: On a quick confession and a late denial]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
Koppen. P.J. van & Mackor, A.R. (2020). A scenario-approach to the Simonshaven case. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(4), 1132-1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12429
Maegherman, E.F.L., Boer, M.M. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De onzichtbare steekpartij: Over strategische selectie van getuigenbewijs [The invisible stabbing: On strategic selection of witness evidence]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
Rijnders, J., Dirksen, L., Splinters, R., Scheepers, J., Beijers, G., Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De Mokumse mokermoord: Bewijsproblemen met camera-opnames [The Amsterdam Sledge Murder: Evidence problems of CCTV recordings]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
Vis, J., Akker, K. van den, Hoes, L., Simons, E., Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). De dood van een politie-aspirant: Over interpretatie van sporen [The death of a police cadet: On interpretation of forensic traces]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
2019
Beermann, M., Fransen, J., Korte, S. de, Luisa, Z., Nieuwendijk, S. van den, Ruiter, E., Veenstra, L., Winniczuk, M., Beijers, G., Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). De PlayStation-moorden: Over bewijs van medeplegen [The PlayStation murders: About evidence of complicity]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
Crolla, F., Sijsling, H., Ykema, L., Grimberg, M., Ranzijn, N., Zutter, A. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). The creative carpenter: Biased presentation of evidence in a jury trial. Den Haag: Eleven.
Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Maegherman, E., & Horselenberg, R. (2019). Het verhaal gewogen: Kennis van strafrechters over het geheugen en het politieverhoor [Weighed the story: Knowledge of criminal judges on memory and the police interview]. Strafblad, 17(4), 58-63.
2018
Dobben, M.L. van, Verkuijlen, F., Jovanović, L., Stokhof, M.R., Borst, L.L.M., Schaik, Y. van, Thiel, M.A.H. van, Willemsen, M., Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). De dansende dader: Veelzeggende experimenten [The dancing offender: Telling experiments]. Den Haag: Boom Juridisch.
Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2018). Waarom er in België en Nederland geen rechterlijke dwalingen zijn [Why there are no miscarriages of justice in Belgium and the Netherlands]. Expertise en Recht, 2018, 276-281.
Validity of statements
2024
De Zutter, A. (2024). Echte en valse aangiftes van verkrachting [True and false reports of rape]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Horselenberg, R. & Geven, L. (2024). Valse bekentenissen [False confessions]. Geijsen, K. & Horselenberg, R. (2024). Het verhoor van verdachten 2.0 [Interviewing suspects 2.0]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Vredeveldt, A., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2024). Fundamenten van herkennen [Fundamentals of identification]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
2023
Bruïne, G. de, Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2023) Culture and credibility: The assessment of asylum seekers’ statements. Psychology, Crime and Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2279328
2022
Skrifvars, J., Sui, V., Antfolk, J., Veldhuizen, T. van & Korman, J. (2022). Psychological assumptions underlying credibility assessments in Finnish asylum determinations. Nordic Psychology, 76(1), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2022.2145986
Vredeveldt, A., & Bruïne, G. de (2022). Not universally sinful: Cultural aspects of memory sins. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(4), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000089
2021
Otgaar, H., Horselenberg, R., Rassin, E., Wessel, I., Jelicic, M., Vredeveldt, A., & Koppen, P.J. van. (2021). De wetenschap achter verdrongen en valse herinneringen. [The science behind repressed and false memories.] De Psycholoog.
2020
Anakwah, N., Horselenberg, R., Hope, L., Amankwah-Poku, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). Cross-cultural differences in eyewitness memory reports. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 504-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3637
Anakwah, N., Horselenberg, R., Hope, L., Amankwah-Poku, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). The acculturation effect and eyewitness memory reports among sub-Saharan African migrants. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12179
Saraiva, R.B., Boeijen, I. van, Hope, L., Horselenberg, R., Sauerland, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020). Eyewitness metamemory predicts identification performance in biased and unbiased lineups. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12166
Saraiva, R.B., Hope, L., Horselenberg, R., Ost, J., Sauer, J. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020) Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance. Memory, 28, 94-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1688835
2019
Saraiva, R.B, Boeijen, I. van, Hope, L., Horselenberg, R., Sauerland, M. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Development and validation of the Eyewitness Metamemory Scale (EMS). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 33, 964-973. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3588
Shaw, J., & Vredeveldt, A. (2019). The recovered memory debate continues in Europe: Evidence from the UK, the Netherlands, France, and Germany. Clinical Psychological Science, 7, 27-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026188036
2018
Bruïne, G. de, Vredeveldt, A., & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Cross-cultural differences in object recognition: Comparing asylum seekers from sub-Saharan Africa and a matched Western European control group. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 463-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3419
Vredeveldt, A., Charman, S.D., Blanken, A. den & Hooydonk, M. (2018). Effects of cannabis on eyewitness memory: A field study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3414
Zutter, A.W.E.A. de, Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Motives for filing a false allegation of rape. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 457-464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0951-3
Witness and suspect interviewing
2024
Geijsen, K. & Horselenberg, R. (2024). Het verhoor van verdachten 2.0 [Interviewing suspects 2.0]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Horselenberg, R. & Vredeveldt, A. (2024). Het verhoren van een getuige [Interviewing a witness]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Horselenberg, R., Vredeveldt, A., Sleen, J. van der & Erens, B. (2024). Het verhoren van een kind [Interviewing a child]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Oleszkiewicz, S., Atkinson, D.J., Kleinman, S. & Meissner, C.A. (2024). Building trust to enhance elicitation. International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, 37(2), 666-687. https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2023.2255507
Veldhuizen, T. van, Bruïne, G. de & Vredeveldt, A. (2024). Het interculturele verhoor [The cross-cultural interview]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Vredeveldt, A. & Zee, S. van der (2024). Het verband tussen consistentie en deceptie [The relationship between consistency and deception]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
2023
Oleszkiewicz, S., Madfors, M., Jones, M., & Vredeveldt, A. (2023). Proximity-based evidence disclosure: An operational purpose for disclosing evidence in investigative interviews. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 29(3), 302-319. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000089
Veldhuizen, T. van (2023). Fact-finding in asylum cases. In S. Landström, P.A. Granhag & P.J. van Koppen (eds.), The future of forensic psychology: Core topics and emerging trends. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003308546-19
Vredeveldt, A., & Given-Wilson, Z., & Memon, A. (2023). Culture, trauma, and memory in investigative interviews. Psychology, Crime, & Law. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2023.2209262
2022
Adams-Quackenbush, N.M., Horselenberg, R., Vrij, A., Satchell, L.P. & Koppen, P.J. van (2022). Articulating guilt? The influence of guilt presumption on interviewer question phrasing and word abstraction. Current Psychology, 41, 2139–2151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00726-z
Hope, L., Anakwah, N., Antfolk, J., Brucacher, S.P., Flowe, H., Gabberts, F., Giebels, E., Kanja, W., Korkman, J., Kyo, A., Naka, M., Otgaar, H., Powell, M.B., Selim, H., Skrifvars, J., Kwasi sorkpah, I., Sowatey, E.A., Steele, L.C., Stevens, L., Sumampouw, N.E.J., Taylor, P.J., Trevino-Range;, J., Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Wang, J., Wells, S. (2022). Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture, memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 27(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12202
Kask, K., Groznov, N. & Veldhuizen, T. van (2022). A vignette study of novices’ interviewing skills of asylum seekers. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 20(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1607
Skrifvars, J., Antfolk, J., Veldhuizen, T. van, Sui, V., & Korkman, J. (2022). Eliciting information in official Finnish asylum interviews. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(3), 508-519. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3936
Vredeveldt, A. & Tredoux, C.G. (2022). Composite communication: How dissemination of facial composites in the media affects police investigations. Memory, Mind & Media, 1, e10, 1-16 (Inaugural Collection). https://doi.org/10.1017/mem.2022.4
2021
Brimbal, L., Meissner, C.A., Kleinman, S.M., Phillips, E.L., Atkinson, D.J., Dianiska, R.E., Rothweiler, J.N., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Jones, M.S. (2021). Evaluating the benefits of a rapport-based approach to investigative interviews: A training study with law enforcement investigators. Law and Human Behavior, 45(1), 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000437
Odinot, G., Rosmalen, E.A.J. van, & Vredeveldt, A. (2021). Eyewitness testimony. In J. M. Brown & M. A. H. Horvath (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108848916.023
Oleszkiewicz, S., & Watson, S. J. (2021). A meta-analytics review of the timing for disclosing evidence when interviewing suspects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(2), 342-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3767
2020
De La Fuente Vilar, A., Horselenberg, R., Strömwall, L.A., Landström, S., Hope, L. & Koppen, P.J. van (2020) Effects of cooperation on information disclosure in mock-witness interviews. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 25, 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12167
Brimbal, L., Kleinman, S.M., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Meissner, C.A. (2020). Developing rapport and trust in the interrogative context: An empirically-supported and ethical alternative to customary interrogation practices. In book: Interrogation and torture: Research on efficacy and its integration with morality and legality. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190097523.003.0006
Oleszkiewicz, S., & Granhag, P.A. (2020). Establishing cooperation and eliciting information: Semi-cooperative sources’ affective resistance and cognitive strategies. In book: Handbook of legal and investigative psychology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429326530-18
Rantamäki, S., Antfolk, J., Granhag, P.A., Santtila, P., & Oleszkiewicz, S. (2020). Eliciting Intelligence from sources informed about counter-interrogation strategies: An experimental study on the Scharff Technique. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(2), 191-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1542
Skrifvars, J., Korkman, J., Sui, V., Veldhuizen, T. van, & Antfolk, J. (2020). An analysis of question style and type in official Finnish asylum interview transcripts. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 17(3), 333-348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1557
2019
Adams-Quackenbush, N.M., Horselenberg, R., Hubert, J., Vrij, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Interview expectancies: Awareness of potential biases influences behaviour in interviewees. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1485522
Adams-Quackenbush, N.M., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Where bias begins: A snapshot of police officers’ beliefs about the investigative interview with suspects. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 34, 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9301-1.
Adams-Quackenbush, N.M., Horselenberg, R., Tomas, F. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Detecting guilt-presumption in a police-suspect interview: An evaluation of the questions in a murder case. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 10, 37-60. https://iiirg.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/II-RP-Volume-10-Issue-1-Adams-Quackenbush-et-al.pdf
Granhag, P.A., Oleszkiewicz, S., Sakrisvold, M.L., & Kleinman, S.M. (2019). The Scharff technique: Training military intelligence officers to elicit information from small cells of sources. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 26(5), 438-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2019.1669600
2018
Veldhuizen, T.S. van, Maas, R.P.A.E., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Establishing origin: Analysing questions in asylum interviews. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25, 283-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1376607
Eyewitness collaboration
2024
van Rosmalen, E.A.J. & Vredeveldt, A. (2024). Collaborative interviewing of eyewitnesses: A field study. Journal of Criminal Psychology, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-04-2024-0028
2019
Vredeveldt, A. (2019). Getuigenverhoor bij de rechter-commissaris: De invloed van overleg tussen getuigen [Eyewitness interviews by the investigative judge: The influence of discussion between witnesses]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 2, 119-122.
Vredeveldt, A., Deuren, S. van, & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). Remembering with a stranger: Comparing acquainted and unacquainted pairs in collaborative eyewitness interviews. Memory, 27, 1390-1403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1662052
2018
Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Recounting a common experience: On the effectiveness of instructing eyewitness pairs. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 284. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00284
Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L. & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Writing alone or together: Police officers’ collaborative reports of an incident. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(7), 1071–1092. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818771721
Evidence
2024
De Beuf, T.L.F. & Koppen, P.J. van (2024). Het testen van Thijs: Een gevalsstudie van forensisch psychologisch testgebruik [Testing Thijs: A case study of the use of tests in forensic psychology]. De Psycholoog, 58, 10-25.
Horselenberg, R., Koppen, P.J. van & Vredeveldt, A. (2024). Herkenningsprocedures [Identification procedures]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Keijser, J.W. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2024). De waarde van bewijs [The value of evidence]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
2023
Gemert, M.J.C. van, Zwinderman, A.H., Koppen, P.J. van, Martino Neumann, H.A. & Vlaming, M. (2023). Child abuse, misdiagnosed by an expertise center. Part II: Misuse of Bayes’ Theorem. Children, 10, 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10050843
Vlaming, M., Sauer, P.J.J., Janssen, E.P.F., Koppen, P.J. van, Bruijninckx, C.M.A., Akkerman Zaalberg-van Zelst, M.W.M., Martino Neumann, H.A. & Gemert, M.J.C. van (2023). Child abuse, misdiagnosed by an expertise center. Part I: Medico-social aspects. Children, 10, 963. https://doi.org/10.3390/children10060963
2022
Koppen, P.J. van (2022). De som van alle bewijs: Scenario’s in strafzaken [The sum of all evidence: Scenarios in criminal cases]. Amsterdam: De Kring.
Maegherman, E., Ask, K., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2022). Law and order effects: On cognitive dissonance and belief perseverance. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 22(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1855268
Nieuwkamp, R., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2023). You don’t know: Knowledge as supportive alibi evidence. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 30, 695-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2022.2116608
2021
Boer, M.M. de, Wiznitzer, S.N.P. & Koppen, P.J. van (2021). Foreign DNA in cosmetic gel nails. Forensic Science International, 319, 110677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110677
Kesteloo, L., & Vredeveldt, A. (2021). Bodycambeelden als controlemiddel in de strafrechtspraktijk [Body-worn camera footage as a monitoring tool in the practice of criminal law]. Nederlands Juristenblad, 13, 966-973.
Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L., & Hildebrandt, A. (2021). To watch or not to watch: When reviewing body-worn camera footage improves police reports. Law and Human Behavior. http://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000462
2020
Vredeveldt, A., Kesteloo, L. & Hildebrandt, A. (2020). De rol van bodycambeelden in de opsporing en bewijsvoering. Politiewetenschap, 119, 1-85.
2019
Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2019). Een kleine Netflix-gids voor de bewijsliefhebber [A concise Netflix guide for the evidence afficionado]. Expertise en Recht, 2019, 79-86.
Nieuwkamp, R., Horselenberg, R. & Koppen, P.J. van (2019). True and false alibis among prisoners and its detection by police officers. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25, 902-921. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2018.1482570
Police investigation
2024
Eeden, C.A.J. van den, Gruijter, M. & Poot, C.J. de (2024). Psychologische invloeden op forensisch-technisch onderzoek [Psychological influences on forensic investigations]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
Vredeveldt, A. & Koppen, P.J. van (2024). De rol van compo’s in het opsporingsonderzoek [The role of compositions in police investigations]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
2023
Tredoux, C.G., Frowd, C.D., Vredeveldt, A., & Scott, K. (2023). Construction of facial composites from eyewitness memory. In L. Shapiro & P.M. Rea (Eds.), Biomedical visualisation: Volume 13 – The art, philosophy and science of observation and imaging. Cham: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13021-2_8
2022
Kemp, J.J. van der (2022). Zoeken naar zedendaders: Over gegevensbestanden, criminologisch onderzoek en opsporingsstrategieën [Searching for sex offenders: About using datasets, criminological research and investigative strategies]. In S. De Kimpe, J. Janssen, P. Struyf & J. Winter (eds.), Zedenzaken [Vice cases]. Antwerpen: Gompel & Svacina.
2021
Eeden, C.A.J. van den, Berkel, J.J. van, Lankhaar, C.C., & Poot, C.J. de (2021). Opsporen, vervolgen en tegenhouden van cybercriminaliteit [Investigating, prosecuting and obstructing cybercrime]. WODC.
2020
Nortje, A., Tredoux, C. G., & Vredeveldt, A.(2020). Eyewitness identification of multiple perpetrators. South African Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(2), 348-381.
Sporer, S. L., Tredoux, C. G., Vredeveldt, A., Kempen, K., & Nortje, A. (2020). Does exposure to facial composites damage eyewitness memory? A comprehensive review. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1166-1179. http://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3705
Tredoux, C. G., Sporer, S. L.,Vredeveldt, A., Kempen, K., & Nortje, A. (2020). Does constructing a facial composite affect eyewitness memory? A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09432-z
2019
Koppen, P.J. van, Kemp, J.J. van der & Wijkman, M.D.S. (2019). Rapporteren over activiteiten op de plaats delict: Over de keuze tussen daders [Reporting on activities at the crime scene: About the choice between offenders]. Expertise en Recht, 2019, 96-104.
Pike, G.E., Brace, N.A., Turner, J., & Vredeveldt, A. (2019). The effect of facial composite construction on eyewitness identification accuracy in an ecologically valid paradigm. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46, 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818811376
Pike, G.E., Brace, N.A., Turner, J., Ness, H. & Vredeveldt, A. (2019). Advances in facial composite technology, utilizing holistic construction, do not lead to an increase in eyewitness misidentifications compared to older feature-based systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01962
2018
Eeden, C.A.J. van den, Ost, J., Poot, C.J. de & Koppen, P.J. van (2018). Solving the puzzle: The effects of contextual information and feedback on the interpretation of a crime scene. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15, 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1494
Koppen, P.J. van & Horselenberg, R. (2018). Van toneelspelende politiemensen en onwetende verdachten die bekennen tegen Mr. Big [Of play-acting police officers and ignorant suspects who confess to Mr. Big]. Strafblad.
Geographical profiling
2024
Kemp, J.J. van der & Koppen, P.J. van (2024). Profilering in de opsporing [Profiling in investigations]. In J.W. de Keijser, R. Horselenberg, & A. Vredeveldt (red.), Tussen wet en wetenschap: De psychologie van het recht [Between law and science: The psychology of law]. Den Haag: Boom juridisch.
2022
Kemp, J.J. van der (2021). The modus via of sex offenders and the use of geographical offender profiling in sex crime cases. In Deslauriers-Varin, N. & Bennell, C. (eds.), Criminal investigations of sexual offenses: Techniques and challenges. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79968-7_4